Because It Needed to be Said:
Addressing the jabby elephant in the room for posterity’s sake.
Around the world, we are seeing sudden upticks of strange occurrences such as “Sudden Adult Death Syndrome,” “Climate-related” deaths and an “unexplainable” uptick in children experiencing seemingly random liver failures leading to hepatic disease. No matter what Vanguard-owned news site you frequent, you will inevitably be hit with the same quotes on all of these. Something along the lines of “Experts and researchers are baffled.” However, despite the ‘Great Bafflement’ these unnamed and unsourced experts are experiencing, there may be a quite obvious and scientifically sound explanation to connect these dots and it isn’t Climate Change.
To prepare for the inevitable roll-out of the next round of jab craze, it’s prudent to take a deep dive into the healing waters of truth and analyze why a recently pushed product from frequently-sued pharmaceutical companies may be the best answer to the question “Why is Aunt Suzie convulsing in the corner?”
On the origin of the Craze
In late 2019, a mysterious craze was sweeping through Wuhan, China. Its origins were mysterious and absolutely no one wanted to talk about it over the recent controversies of how many scoops of ice cream Donald Trump had at dinner. Health officials stated it was not cause for concern and no one should be doing anything crazy like wearing masks since there was no evidence this mystery illness could spread between people. Eventually the “Health” officials were proven wrong, as they would soon become known for being, and the first few cases of the great virus which cannot be named spread through the West, making it the go-to page 1 headline for lazy community news reporters across the country. Arguments raged on political lines as to whether this virus was as dangerous as health officials were now claiming and in their infinite wisdom, those same health officials decided to warehouse infected elderly people together and put the ill on ventilators, leading to a steep increase in deaths. If at this point people still hadn’t recognized the “health” officials as being habitually wrong, then it may have been somewhat excused. After all, the government demanded we all shutter our doors and businesses and allow a massive wealth transfer to Vanguard flatten the curve for your health, so how were we to get information?
Some physicians were hitting important points through their available platforms and illustrating that the virus spreading around wasn’t necessarily a respiratory disease, but an endothelial one, owing much of its damage to one specific protein. While this basically invalidated the current treatment protocol of many hospital networks, namely waiting for you to get sick enough to shove a tube down your throat and pump you full of organ-failing compounds while they collected government dollars, it did awaken many to the real issue with the virus and why the direction of the pharmaceutical companies may not be the best road to travel down.
The Spike Protein in question
According to many digital models provided by the government in lieu of satisfying Koch’s postulate, Sars 2: Electric Boogaloo comes with a very interesting Spike protein. This Spike protein has patented material from Moderna and a potential to cause thrombotic events, lymphocytopenia and more due to two major mechanisms of action. The first main mode of attack from the Spike protein is its ability to attach to the ACE-2 receptor within our cells. This particular receptor domain is important in helping to regulate Angiotensin II levels which keep things like blood pressure and inflammation in check. When the Spike protein attaches to that receptor it downregulates ACE-2, leading to an uptick of oxidative stressors and the generation of Reactive Oxidative Species, or ROS, specifically one called Superoxide Dismutase. This is particularly damaging because ROS are damaging to your cells. Left unchecked, it can create greater issues. While it sounds daunting, it actually means the main mechanism of action for the virus to create damage is entirely treatable with over the counter supplementation to diffuse the damaging effects of ROS, namely antioxidants such as NAC, though that was not the direction “health officials” took.
The second main mechanism of action is often overlooked because of the implications to the virus’ origin. Patients who have taken blood serum levels of cd4 and cd8 T-cells before, during and after infection show a steep decline of T-cell count as a result of acute infection. This is because the virus has a very interesting binding domain called Glycoprotein-120. This specific protein allows the spike protein to infect and disable T-lymphocytes. If you are wondering why this is often overlooked, it’s because Glycoprotein-120 comes from the HIV virus and it’s difficult to explain how a bat corona virus somehow became cross-pollinated with so much patented and human viral material. Such a feat requires a level of mental gymnastics Anthony Fauci is not capable of, especially when he helped fund its creation through project Defuse with oversight from Ecohealth Alliance. While this sounds very scary, and it has the potential to be, understand that those individuals who have tested themselves to measure their T-lymphocytes also found that they returned to normal after the virus passed. Perhaps this is why the latest Pfizermectin contains both a protease inhibitor, like its more effective and cheaper competition, and an HIV medication as part of its protocol.
The Injection
When the injections rolled out, many were skeptical. “Health officials” had done everything they could to bury cheaper and more effective treatment modalities that were being proven effective in study after study. It was clear to some that the fix was in. Rather than create a standard, attenuated virus injection, they opted to create an entirely new, gene therapy platform that would program your cells to produce “immunity.” Except it didn’t, doesn’t now and never will and they know it.
To those who followed the previous conversation on the dangers of the spike protein, it is important to note that the protein is capable of causing pathology on its own. It does not need the viral attachment to create all of the problems stated before. People who followed the mechanism of action of that Spike protein were scratching their heads. Why were pharmaceutical companies pursuing a mode of combating this illness by programming your own cells to produce the very toxic and thrombotic molecule, HIV inserts and all, that can cause all kinds of havoc, now able to enter different parts of your body it previously had no means of interacting with?
How they work and Why they are dangerous: The Safety
While many injections are currently on the market with multiple mechanisms of action, they all basically function to a similar end, with creation of the original Wuhan variant of the spike protein. Pfizer and Moderna use synthetic messenger RNA to carry code into your cells. Think of this code as a recipe and your cells contain little chefs called ribosomes. These Ribosomes will read that instruction and cook whatever the recipe says to cook. In this case, it’s the spike protein. Within each vial, there is, according to official accounts, a synthetic nano-lipid layer of fat which carries the mRNA. The theory for its use would be that once it is shot into the soft tissue of your arm, cells in the soft tissue will uptake the mRNA and start producing spike proteins which will signal your lymphatic system to mount an attack, leading to an immune response which will make you protected from the virus. Except none of that is accurate. The injection does not stay in the soft tissue of your arm, it travels all over your body. Pharmacokinetics studies from Japan have shown in animal models that the organs with the highest concentration of gene therapy uptake soon after injection were the spleen and reproductive organs.
Every cell has ribosomes which will read that code and start producing spike proteins leading to significant damage to those organs either through the cytotoxic effects of the protein itself, or a hyperactive immune response from your own system now programmed to attack cells spit out by your liver or spleen or reproductive organs. All of this is if the injection is spit out into the soft tissue of your arm and not delivered directly into a vein. Most “health workers” do not aspirate needles meaning they are not checking to see if they struck a vein in your arm before they deliver the payload. All of that spike producing code could be delivered directly into your heart as it travels along your endothelial system, causing those cells to start producing spike. You might expect in these situations to see a large uptick in events such as blood clots and heart attacks or in some cases, immediate death.
The HIV inserts from GP-120 can significantly deplete T-lymphocytes. If you combined the incredible thrombotic potential of the spike protein with the lymphocytic potential of HIV and then injected that into you arm, you may end up with conditions which are now called Vaccine Induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia or VITT. This is a strange and “rare” condition in which you simultaneously have blood clots forming and no white blood cells, meaning treatment for it is basically impossible and outlook is grim. Even in those cases where people did not develop VITT, nearly everyone is known to experience significant decline of CD4 and CD8 T-cells post injection, ranging from a minor decrease from 0-14 days after injection to a full-blown basement level drop below normal after 3-months. The longer one goes post-injection, the more immune compromised they are. How long these effects last is currently not known, mostly because no one is allowed to talk about it, but definitely take your booster because “immunity wanes over time.”
Suppression of, or depletion of T-lymphocytes such as CD8 T-cells is of particular importance in this conversation as CD8 is integral in keeping things like cancer cells and recurrent infections in check. That uptick in shingles and other dormant diseases people are experiencing suddenly has a practical explanation. The longer time stretches on these products, the more deleterious effects we are learning, almost like this was what should have been done before it was thrown out onto the public. We are now even learning that the suppression of ones innate immunity, such as the suppression of Interferon Type 1, could lead to the uptick in the near dormant infectious disease known as monkey pox.
Nano particles: The other threat
If programming your cells to produce a cytotoxic and thrombotic molecule was not enough, it turns out in order to deliver that code into your cells, it has to be kept stable. For years, drug makers struggled to keep mRNA stable enough to deliver the payload for their new plug-and-play coding platform. Issues persisted in past animal models that often left the lab rats dead or with organ failure. The problem is that nano-lipid particles are cytotoxic and damaging to organ tissue. The issue was clear: increase the nano-lipid particles and ensure the mRNA is stable enough to deliver into the cells but risk significant organ damage in the process or decrease the lipid content and risk rapid mRNA breakdown. It was a balancing act that no one solved before rushing this product out to people’s arms. In the early days of the warnings against these injections, molecular biologists, geneticists and more warned of the potential reproductive effects of the injections, mostly pointing to the potential damaging effects of the spike protein. Some also looked at the damaging affects of the synthetic nano-particles themselves, which are known to have significant and deleterious effects on the reproductive system including reducing cell proliferation, decreased ovary weight, decreased epididymis weight, gene dysregulation and expression, reduced number of mature oocytes, affected egg-laying capability and damaging affects to sperm and Leydig cells. These particles are not just damaging to the reproductive organs, they are damaging to any organ that they are absorbed into and as we know from the biodistribution studies, this stuff goes everywhere. How can we know that such damaging effects are taking hold? You would find studies indicating those who received the injections have significantly decreased sperm counts. You might see birth rates dropping dramatically among the most highly jabbed countries and you may even find an increase in stillbirths and miscarriages.
In one of the most egregious examples of study alterations imaginable, The New England Journal of Medicine attempted to assuage early concerns over this by publishing a V-safe reporting system analysis. The problem with the study is that in order to assuage fears in pregnant women who were at the most risk of spontaneous abortion, those under twenty weeks, they decided to backload the observed group with women who were over 20 weeks pregnant. Table four of this study shows clearly that had they not attempted to skew the data here, it would have indicated that around 82-percent of participating pregnancies under 20 weeks ended in spontaneous abortion. When this was pointed out, rather than retracting the study for obvious data tampering, the New England Journal of medicine decided instead to simply remove parts of Table 4 which showed their problematic behavior.
Ok, so it may have risks, but it’s at least effective...
No, it’s not. It may be old hat to point out at this point, but pharmaceutical companies used Relative Risk Reduction instead of Absolute Risk Reduction to confer how “effective” these shots were at preventing “clinical disease.” These terms are specific and important because they basically mean that they never looked to see if they prevent you from catching the virus, only if it prevented serious symptoms and, on that regard, they chose to ignore that it was really less than 1 percent effective at its target goal. In fact, there is known significant danger to priming your immune system to fighting off pathogens that are no longer in circulation, such as the alpha variant or the “wild type” Sars 2 virus. The specific condition is known as Antibody Dependent Enhancement and describes a situation in which your immune system completely ignores new variants and permits them to infect the cells without impediment. As the previously linked study pointed out, study participants, which encompasses everyone who took an EUA authorized drug compound, were not told it could potentially make their inevitable infection worse. These products are pushed on people under the auspices that they will be “saving grandma” by taking them, however they do not prevent infection, in fact they encourage it. They do not stop spread and they do nothing in terms of muting severity of infection because they aren’t geared towards the current variant in circulation. What they are effective at is increasing all cause mortality around the word, lowering birthrates and turning your immune system into a paid subscription model.
Discussion
This is by no means a comprehensive list of concerns, as more issues are found with these injections monthly. It is meant to be a brief explanation of why some people may look at a product with so much secrecy and data suppression surrounding it and say “Yeah, not really for me or mine.” There are far greater lines of inquiry to be investigated with these compounds, including the mRNA injections potential ability to spread from person to person and their potential to be coded into your DNA. The official FDA documents on the legally distinct Comirnaty compound, for example, contains more censored material in its manufacturing process than not, which should on its face give people pause, yet we sit in a country were employers and government actors, as well as poorly informed social media activists spurred by AstroTurfed bot campaigns, seek to force average Americans into some bizarre conformity ritual to risk their own lives and health to fight off a virus which never had much more than a 1-percent severity risk.
These points have to be made to give context to greater issues facing the Heartland. Without clearly outlining the risks and potential adverse events from these products, people cannot give informed consent for treatment and citizens seeking to push back against the next wave of this attack will not have the language to do it. We are entering a world in which federal regulatory committees no longer examine pharmaceutical products on any other merit besides profitability for their funders and they are now aiming that needle-eyed gaze at our children. When the regulatory committees inevitably add these injections to the ever-growing list of “required” childhood immunizations, what will your local school board do? How will you push back against it? Ohioans need effective, science-based arguments available to them so they do not rely on hearsay. They need to have studies they can reference back to. This needed to be said not because it is timely to our current myriad of issues necessarily, but because it is inevitable that this battle will be fought again, and with greater stakes as we learn more.
Questions, comments or concerns about this article? Leave a comment down below and let us know your thoughts about this piece and make sure to subscribe to get regular updates.
Want to reach The Heartland Beat directly? Send us an email at theheartlandbeat@gmail.com
Be sure to sound off in the comment section and like, share and subscribe for more updates.