Over the last two months the national headlines have been hyper-focused on a few mile stretch of road on the border of Texas. The arguments have surrounded the current Biden administration’s plan to continue to permit unfettered access to the country to whoever wants in while providing them thousands of dollars and no monitoring once through ,versus the Governor of Texas who is proposing that drug and child trafficking is bad and should probably be more closely watched.
As the debate raged on surrounding a short mile of land called Eagle Pass, now wrapped in razor wire, many ignored the fact that .5 miles further down that same road there was no barrier at all, or monitoring of any kind. While some might argue the entire debate is simply window dressing to gear up for the next election cycle, others have pointed out that the national debate is lip service for a problem that is taking root in nearly every state across the country, including Ohio, with no real end ever considered. This debate has made more people than ever aware of a shocking conspiracy theory that the left has been quick to “debunk” while acknowledging it is happening nearly every chance it gets.
In 1925, Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, founder of the Pan-European Union, published his book entitled Praktischer Idealismus. In this book Kalergi argued for a unified race-mixed Europe which he believed would bring an end to cultural strife between the nations, and hopefully war itself. However his vision of the future did not end at what would later become the blueprint for the now European Union and future groups like the World Economic Forum. It stretched beyond to a future world in which the centralized European control structure that would be birthed from his ideals would eventually expand to the African continent and more and all races would become one.
“The man of the future will be of mixed race,” Kalergie wrote. “Today's races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals."
While some have argued the conspiracy to replace the western world is a vile theory, others have pointed out that Kalergi’s Pan-European Union and plan for a ‘unified Europe’ formed the backbone of the ideology behind the League of Nations, with founding members Winston Churchill and French Prime Minister Aristide Briand giving speeches on its laurels and praising Kalergi for his utopic vision. While there is much debate and contention today surrounding the concept that today’s replacement migration was ultimately a planned or orchestrated endeavor, others have deferred to the current leftist philosophy of ‘systems thinking heuristic,’ which proposes that “a system is what it does.” Whether or not one feels the argument of the “Kalergi plan” to replace Europeans and bring the world under unified control is valid, the fact is the current leading name for male children in Britain and The Netherlands is Mohammad and European nations have less sovereignty now than ever in history. A system is what it does, not what it intends to do.
As stated, this situation is not unique to Europe. It is arguably happening, and perhaps to a greater extent, throughout much of the U.S. Over the last two years, the small city of Springfield, Ohio has been battling with an identity problem. On the one hand is a city with a rich history of economic development during the 1920’s, that nearly saw itself turn into a bustling metropolis. After a disastrous fire, the town rebuilt during the age of manufacturing to become a leading middleclass labor town nestled between two of the largest metropolitan areas in the state, only to be ravaged by the flight of jobs during the passing of NAFTA and the era of Reaganomics.
Today it is a town where grass overgrows the parking lots of closed down malls and the leading employment industries are food service and transporting drugs across the interstate. This current economic disposition has made it a prime target for what elitists refer to as “Building Back Better.” Though to get to that state, one must instigate a larger problem.
With housing costs at rock bottom levels due to decreasing property values, nonprofits like St. Vincent De Paul and ABLE are assisting a mass influx of Haitian immigrants to the tune of 15,000 over the last year, most of which coming in from the southern border. Some estimates now put the Haitian population of Springfield to be about 20 percent of the total population of the city. This has led to mass contention among the ‘native’ population as the increased migration has troubled the already offensive violent crime rate as well as led to dangerous road conditions from unlicensed drivers where at least one child has already been killed.
Opponents to the theory of Kalergi replacement migration often argue that it makes no logical sense. That ultimately there is no gain to the mass population influx that doesn’t lead to more problems such as overcrowded housing and ultimately decreased labor value and suppressed wages from over competition in the job market place. With all of these net negatives, one might wonder why anyone wouldn’t be chomping at the bit for an opportunity to transform their local collapsed economy faster. However, diving into the deeper ploys at play actually reveals how illegal immigration plays a much larger role into the biggest grift there is.
After digging ourselves into a massive national debt to the tune of trillions so we can give billions annually in foreign aid to grifting operations abroad, or even the untold billions to grifting operations domestically during the plandemic, inflation is skyrocketing due to constant printing of money, making basic daily life for average Americans incredibly difficult. One way that is being combatted, apparently, is through immigration. Fewer workers means employers need to pay higher wages to ensure work gets done, which translates to higher prices. One way around that is to flood the market with workers to suppress wages and keep inflation artificially suppressed. In doing this, you are able to keep a handle on the numbers, at least on paper. The average American suffers under the weight of rising costs and lowered wages as well as the increased tax burden from services to their new neighbors, but international grifts that steal from American tax coffers can still continue.
However, once you flood an area with immigrants, you introduce another enticing problem. People need housing, food, utilities and access to other basic needs. This presents an infrastructure problem for any community, or an infrastructure ‘opportunity.’ While these newly placed residents often present a significant drain on social service funds, they more than make up for it in local infrastructure development projects and the artificial pumping of GDP for any given area, including those that are otherwise economic toilet bowls.
- The GDP Grift -
If you aren’t familiar with social services in Ohio or how they work, here is a briefer that might illuminate a few things. As an example, within Cuyahoga County there are several organizations that play a factor in artificially increasing GDP, one of them is OhioMeansJobs. Every year, migrant and seasonal workers lose employment as the weather cools, allowing them to file for unemployment benefits and social service subsidies. As a means of tracking their progress and keeping the conservative voting base happy, a pseudo reemployment program, called RESEA was formed to select unemployment candidates for reemployment services, which could include additional free money to attend a tech or trade school and secure certification through the federal WIOA program or just general job search assistance. Whether or not these candidates accept additional services, so long as they attend their two mandated check in appointments, their benefits are kept on track. Additionally, whether or not that person secures new employment with a different employer, the same job once the seasons turn again, or a job through the program itself, it gets counted as a job placement, and is correlated in county and state data as successful reemployment in a “new job.” The money they spend arguably pumps up the local and national economy through the purchase of basic goods like food items, artificially increasing GDP for short periods.
In metropolitan communities like Cleveland-Cuyahoga County, the issues of increased demand for housing through immigration and migration has led to a number of federal grants being disbursed for local housing developments. These row home contracts get dispersed via the development of “local economic task forces” to local developing companies to build up row homes that will eventually be sold off to landlords who rent out to the state again to the new housing voucher recipients. The spending of said dollars however adds to the GDP pump, creating the illusion of a burgeoning local economy.
In other words, the state reemploys the same people every year in an illusory push to propagate the idea that job opportunities are expanding to help push the narrative of housing developing needs via mass migration. This utilizes funds dispersed by the federal government paid for by your grandchildren’s future labor creating the perception of growing economies and the need for greater infrastructure. Those wondering how California is simultaneously considered such a massive economy while being completely riddled with homelessness and so much debt need only apply these principles to the question and suddenly the ruse makes far more sense. It’s artificial and short term which is why it has to keep going every year or else the whole thing collapses.
But why do all of this still? Why create the illusion of a growing economy while it is obvious to any domestic worker that they are bearing the brunt of all of this excessive spending and madness? Why continue to pretend immigration leads to any permanent drive in economic development when fire marshals in local areas like Findlay have broken up many hotel stay ventures where immigrants are clustered and relocated every 29 days to avoid paying taxes and nearly half of their ‘garnered earnings’ end up shipped back home rather than spent domestically? The answer to that may lie with the public-private partnership at the heart of much of this infrastructure rebuilding.
Jobs Ohio, is a private non-profit venture created by the Ohio state legislature, with the stated goal of guiding and assisting in the growth and development of just that; infrastructure. It should come as no surprise that the organization partners with the World Economic Forum, and offers grants and funding opportunities for businesses that are striving to be ‘minority’ controlled, which has led to the diversification of many workforces seeking these federally funded dollars. Among its stated goals and projects, is the greater need for broadband access, renewable resources and generally everything that leads to the development of the future 15-minute city infrastructure that will imprison the future.
If you are still following, then it will come as no surprise then that the recent influx of immigrants, no doubt many illegal, being shipped into Springfield has led to the predictable next stage of this operation in ‘revitalization,’ an Immigration Accountability Response Team to monitor and address issues related to immigrant employment, housing, crime and driver’s education. It is almost as if this strategy happens the exact same way in every area. Take a dilapidated economy, pump it full of a problem in need of a solution and then roll out that solution. It just so happens the ‘problem’ brings drugs and human trafficking and the ‘solution’ is an eventual technocratic prison system.
The origins of western deconstruction lie with the predators' acknowledgement of our own drive towards empathy. From the earliest days of the Kalergi strategy of de-homogenization to the current attack on the concept of domestic sovereignty, its success hinges on the ability to prey on your perception of being good to those around you or the threat of being perceived as ‘mean.’ To not support these efforts is to support the various ‘Isms’ and ‘phobias’ that drive the narratives of those that seek to enslave your children. But make no mistake, the drive for their collective utopia is a threat to all. In Springfield, Ohio, opposition to the recent forced replacement has gotten so strong that the federal government has begun keeping tabs on the small town project. The FBI has already arrested one local on charges of ‘hate crimes’ giving them pretense for surveillance and have installed billboards seeking to dissuade any future malcontents seeking to form actual opposition to their replacement and future imprisonment.
Carbon and social credits of the 15-minute cities will limit everyone, not just the dissident right and one cannot celebrate the tapestry of global culture if all become one. As the left so eloquently points out today in underground debates, a system is what it does. In this case, the migrant crisis is allowed to persist on all sides because it continues to hide the economic house of cards that so many grifts depend on until such time as a CBDC can be established. The victims of this system do not belong to just one color or creed but all who call themselves nationals. These victims are our children and their future as well as our ancestors and their identity. Who we are and where we come from will be erased and replaced with a great reset of sorts, a digital technocracy that our descendants will never escape from. Unless we learn to become mean for their sake.
At the conclusion of two world wars, the U.S. became, for a brief time, nationalistic. We constantly looked outside our borders for threats, conveniently ignoring the wolves in our own den. We prided ourselves by telling others we saved them from speaking German in an over simplified strawman of attempting to understand what those conflicts were about, while ignoring that under the new centralized leadership they’ve lost their identity regardless. Those who propose such ideas may do well to ask themselves, for those who gave their lives in said wars, if they saw the world today, would they still feel the same?